Recurring withdrawal cadence
Fixed daily and weekly debits of consistent amounts are the clearest fingerprint of an active advance. MetrikData detects the cadence and groups the related debits into a single position.
Stacking is the fastest way a clean-looking deal turns into a default. MetrikData reads the merchant’s bank statements and surfaces existing MCA positions, recurring funder withdrawals, and the daily debt service eating into deposits — with the exact transactions behind each one.
A merchant with three active advances can still show strong gross deposits. The danger isn’t in the top-line revenue — it’s in the debits. Funders pull repayment on fixed daily or weekly schedules, often under ACH descriptors that don’t obviously read as “loan repayment.” Scrolling a 300-line statement to find them is slow, and it’s easy to miss a position that quietly consumes a fifth of daily cash flow.
MetrikData was built to make that invisible burden visible. It scans every debit for the repayment signatures of MCA funders, groups matched debits into positions, and labels each one with a confidence level so you know what’s a strong match versus a possible one.
Stacking detection combines pattern, cadence, and naming signals — then ties everything back to the underlying transactions so you can verify it yourself.
Fixed daily and weekly debits of consistent amounts are the clearest fingerprint of an active advance. MetrikData detects the cadence and groups the related debits into a single position.
Known funder names, ISO descriptors, and ACH patterns consistent with advance repayment are matched against the debit stream and surfaced with the merchant the money is going to.
From the matched positions, MetrikData estimates the merchant’s existing daily and weekly repayment load — so you can weigh stacking burden against real deposit volume, not guess at it.
Each detected advance is presented as a position with a confidence level, the number of payments seen, and the amount per payment — not a raw list of scattered debits.
Debt service is compared against true external revenue rather than gross deposits, so transfers and non-revenue credits don’t mask how leveraged a merchant really is.
Every position links back to the exact debits that produced it. Nothing is a black box — you can confirm each match before it informs your decision.
Drop in the merchant’s bank-statement PDFs — text-based or scanned. MetrikData reads every transaction and daily balance.
See each existing advance grouped as a position with its cadence, payment amount, and confidence level, plus an estimate of total daily debt service.
Click any position to see the source debits. Correct anything that looks off, then underwrite with a clear view of the stacking burden. The decision stays yours.
MetrikData reads text-based PDF bank statements natively for the most accurate extraction. Scanned or image-based statements can also be processed, though results are strongest when the underlying text is selectable. In every case you can review the parsed transactions before relying on the detected positions.
No. MetrikData surfaces the stacking picture — existing positions, cadence, daily debt service, and burden against external revenue — but it does not approve or decline deals and is not a decision engine. Every figure links back to the source transactions so you can verify it, and the underwriting decision stays with you.
Every detected position links to the exact debits behind it, so you can open it, check the transactions, and correct the label if needed. Corrections flow through to the daily debt service estimate and the overall stacking view, keeping the picture accurate and auditable.
Each position is presented with a confidence level based on cadence, amount consistency, and funder naming signals, so you can tell a strong match from a possible one. Because every match points back to source rows, you are never asked to trust a black-box score.
Start free — your first 4 statement analyses are on us. No credit card required.